<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>George Papayiannis &#187; Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sematopia.com/category/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sematopia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Globe and Mail: It&#8217;s a worrying time to be a spokesbeaver</title>
		<link>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/globe-and-mail-its-a-worrying-time-to-be-a-spokesbeaver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/globe-and-mail-its-a-worrying-time-to-be-a-spokesbeaver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George A. Papayiannis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sematopia.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The telco&#8217;s have been getting a lot of attention the last couple weeks.  On the 22nd of March the Globe &#038; Mail reported that Telus was taking BCE to court over an ad run in Western Canada, were Frank and Gordon (the lovable Bell spokesbears) were bragging that Bell had the most powerful network. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The telco&#8217;s have been getting a lot of attention the last couple weeks.  On the 22nd of March the <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v5/content/subscribe?user_URL=http://www.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FLAC.20070322.RWIRELESS22%2FTPStory%2F%3Fquery%3DBCE%2BTelus%2BLawsuit&#038;ord=130802&#038;brand=theglobeandmail&#038;force_login=true">Globe &#038; Mail reported</a> that Telus was taking BCE to court over an ad run in Western Canada, were Frank and Gordon (the lovable Bell spokesbears) were bragging that Bell had the most powerful network.  The only problem, was that Bell runs off of Telus networks in the West!</p>
<p>This past week BCE was rumoured (on the front page of the Globe) to soon be the target of a takeover by KKR &#8212; an American private equity firm.  BCE quickly denied the reports, but the very next day were reported to be in talks with Telus for a possible merger.  The following script (it&#8217;s a joke) from a Bell Mobility TV commercial was in <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070331.RTHEWEEK31/TPStory/?query=Gordon">todays Globe</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Bell Mobility&#8217;s latest TV commercial, take 23. Action: </p>
<p><strong>Gordon</strong>: So, Frank, did you hear about the company being taken over by Lenny Kravitz?</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: That&#8217;s Henry Kravis, Gord. And by the time he&#8217;s finished with us, you can forget about your lifetime supply of jelly beans.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon</strong>: What would an American leveraged buyout company want with us? I was checking BCE stock yesterday on my new phone using our unlimited calling plan, and apparently the share price hasn&#8217;t moved since Alexander Graham Bell last called his mom on her birthday.</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: That&#8217;s just it, Gord. It doesn&#8217;t matter how well you and I do at attracting the elusive 14-35 demographic in the face of intense competition from hipper, nimbler providers such as Rogers and Virgin Mobile, the fact remains that our shareholders are fed up with BCE stock stinking up their RRSPs.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon</strong>: So that nice man, Michael Sabia, who interviewed us for the job, is he in trouble?</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: Let&#8217;s just say he might just want to think of posting his résumé on workopolis.com. You too, my furry friend. I hear they&#8217;re thinking of replacing you with a possum.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon</strong>: Oh yeah? Well, don&#8217;t count your chickens, because when they find out how much Norm McDonald is getting paid to do your voice, he&#8217;ll be the out the door and you&#8217;ll be talking like Ryan Seacrest.</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: Seacrest&#8217;s cheap. He&#8217;s got no class.</p>
<p><strong>Gordon</strong>: Maybe, but I&#8217;m scared, Frank. Very scared. I can&#8217;t afford to go back to building dams for a living. Can&#8217;t Ottawa step in?</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: That&#8217;s an idea! Hey, why don&#8217;t I call Stephen Harper using Bell Mobility&#8217;s amazing family and friends plan?</p>
<p>(Close-up on Frank holding the ultracool LG Fusic phone. He dials.) </p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: Prime Minister&#8217;s office, please. Oh, hi Mr. Harper. Say, I wondered if you could do something to stop Americans taking over Canada&#8217;s most prized telecommunications network and infrastructure? Hmm-hmm. Yep. Uh-ha. OK. (Hangs up.)</p>
<p><strong>Gord</strong>: What&#8217;s he say?</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: He said he&#8217;d like to help us, but there&#8217;s no Quebec or 905 votes in it.</p>
<p><strong>Gord</strong>: That&#8217;s it. I&#8217;m outta here. Screw those monkeys, I&#8217;m heading over to Telus.</p>
<p><strong>Frank</strong>: Me too.</p>
<p>Exeunt, pursued by a bear.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/globe-and-mail-its-a-worrying-time-to-be-a-spokesbeaver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A closer look into what Google Adwords charges..</title>
		<link>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/a-closer-look-into-what-google-adwords-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/a-closer-look-into-what-google-adwords-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 05:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George A. Papayiannis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP/MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sematopia.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is interesting, though on a small scale, it&#8217;s still relevant.  I run Google Adwords (display ads on specific search terms with Google) for a service I created called WebBasedCron.  A little while ago, I decided to start tracking what ads were really being clicked &#8212; i.e. when an advertisement was clicked, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, though on a small scale, it&#8217;s still relevant.  I run Google Adwords (display ads on specific search terms with Google) for a service I created called <a href="http://www.webbasedcron.com">WebBasedCron</a>.  A little while ago, I decided to start tracking what ads were really being clicked &#8212; i.e. when an advertisement was clicked, it would send them to a special URL (ex. www.webbasedcron.com/?action=advwbc).  Then I would use PHP code like the following to record the persons IP, the date, time and their session id.</p>
<div class='code_parent'>
<div class='code_title'>Code:</div>
<div class='code_child'><code>
<div class='pre_container'>
<pre>if ( $read_action == "advwbc" ) {
        $session = $user->db->quote(session_id());
        $ip = $user->db->quote($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']);
        $date = $user->db->quote(date("'Y-m-d'"));
        $time = $user->db->quote(date('H:i:s'));
        $sqlInsert = "INSERT INTO webcron_google(date,time,ip,session) VALUES ($date,$time,$ip,$session)";
        $user->db->query($sqlInsert);
}</pre>
</div>
<p></code></div>
</div>
<p>The session is important because it tells me if the advertisement was clicked in the same instance of the browser or not (when you restart your browser, you get a new session).  So lets look at the results for March 9th (yesterday).  I changed nothing, only hid half the persons IP address.</p>
<div class='code_parent'>
<div class='code_title'>Code:</div>
<div class='code_child'><code>
<div class='pre_container'>
<pre>2007-03-09  	04:16:35  	211.30.xxx.xx  	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:17:20 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:17:47 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:18:07 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:18:10 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:18:13 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:18:34 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	04:18:36 	211.30.xxx.xx 	9fbe09012f7ce71854b1e040b0b0fe3c
2007-03-09 	07:47:21 	193.71.xx.x 	 1895a2c135512d29fa7002e6a8126e65
2007-03-09 	09:51:47 	59.144.xxx.xxx 	b5c090a6f26d83b890fd2faf79c17464</pre>
</div>
<p></code></div>
</div>
<p>You may notice, that the first 8 lines were from the same IP address (211.30.xxx.xx) clicked between <strong>04:16:35</strong> to <strong>04:18:36</strong>.  It&#8217;s easy to see this person got pretty click happy, clicking the ad, hitting back, clicking the ad, etc.  Furthermore, the session id is the same for all the 8 clicks, which means he/she was using the same browser instance.  I would expect Google to be able to detect this type of click fraud and only charge me for 2 legitimate clicks, the ones placed at <strong>07:47:21</strong> and <strong>09:51:47</strong> (not from 211.30.xxx.xx).  The strange part, is I was charged <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/162/417156489_d2c677acf1_o.jpg">for 4 clicks that day</a>.  That means of the 8 illegitimate clicks, Google charged me for 2 of them.  </p>
<p>Believe me, at an average <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/162/417156489_d2c677acf1_o.jpg">cost per click of $0.11</a>, it really doesn&#8217;t matter, but I can imagine for larger companies, Google must be making a fortune off these people.  Its really hard to side with Google on this, I mean if they deemed 6 of those clicks illegitimate, why not the remaining 2??  Do people really click the same advertisement 8 times in 2 minutes, with many of them 3 seconds apart?  It&#8217;s easy to see that even through blatant click fraud Google shamelessly makes money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sematopia.com/2007/03/a-closer-look-into-what-google-adwords-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
